| The legislation also incorporated elements
of S.721, introduced by Hutchinson-Mikulski. Lead sponsors S.1864
were Kerry, Jeffords, Hutchinson and Mikulski. The House companion
of S.706 also passed in December. The two versions must now be reconciled
in conference. Support for the Nurse Reinvestment Act is broad - nursing
associations, hospital, nursing home, hospice associations, labor,
colleges/universities, etc.
The Nurse Reinvestment Act supports the recruitment
of new nursing students through public service announcements and
career partnerships between health care facilities and schools.
The bill also establishes a fast?track faculty development program
to ensure there are professors to teach the students we recruit.
The bill provides educational support for students who need help
getting-up to speed on math, science and medical English, and daycare
and transportation for single moms and dads with children who need
a hand.
The Nurse Reinvestment Act reinvests in nurses
who are already practicing by providing education and training at
every step of the career ladder. Our bill also helps colleges and
universities develop curriculum in gerontology and long-term care
to prepare nurses to treat our aging population. Finally, the bill
authorizes, for the first time in history, a National Nurse Service
Corps to administer scholarships to students who commit to working
in a health care facility or area that is experiencing a shortage
of nurses.
During the Finance Committee mark-up of the Economic Recovery
and Assistance for American Workers Act on November 8, a Kerry-Rockefeller
Amendment to increase the
FMAP was accepted by the Chairman, and passed out of committee.
The amendment increased the federal Medicaid matching rate by 1.5%
for all states and 3% for high unemployment states, ensuring that
adequate funding existed to provide serious fiscal relief to states
that support health coverage for low-income Americans during the
recession. No further Senate action has yet occurred on the economic
stimulus package, however.
On July 19, JK sent a letter to the President, for which
he secured the signatures of 58 of his Senate colleagues, urging
Bush to allow federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
On July 20, Senator Specter held a press conference (JK was in Boston)
to highlight the Kerry letter and majority Senate support for stem
cell research. In August, President Bush announced his decision
to allow the use of federal funds to conduct studies only on existing
stem cell lines. Federal funds would be prohibited from being used
for the creation or destruction of new embryos as sources of cells.
Thus, Bush adopted a restricted version of the stem cell research
policy Kerry had advocated.
During the first session of the 107th Congress, JK introduced several
health care bills which were poised for Senate consideration, but
ultimately not acted upon prior to adjournment. A few of these bills
are likely to be considered in the second session.
o Medicare Appeals, Regulatory and Contracting
Improvements Act (MARCIA)
Last March, JK joined Senator Murkowski in introducing
the Medicare Education and Regulatory Fairness Act (MERFA), a bill
to reform CMS regulation of Medicare providers. The bill was reintroduced
as MARCIA (S.1738) in November, with Senators Baucus and Grassley
joining JK and Murkowski as lead sponsors. Prior to adjournment,
MARCIA companion legislation was passed in the House.
MARCIA has five primary components. First, it
relieves burdens on beneficiaries and providers by requiring the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to issue rules
and policies in an orderly and reasonable manner. Second, it provides
appeals protections for all Medicare fee-for-service providers and
beneficiaries. Third, it allows CMS to use competition to select
the best available administrative contractors to serve beneficiaries
and providers. Fourth, it requires Medicare contractors and CMS
to place a greater emphasis on provider education and outreach.
Finally, it makes the Medicare overpayment collection and extrapolation
process more fair. The bill accomplishes all of these objectives
without undermining the False Claims Act or other Medicare fraud
recovery efforts, and I urge my colleagues to join with me to secure
its passage.
o S.1686, Safe Nursing and Patient Care Act of
2001
This bill improves working conditions for nurses
and, in turn, the quality of care they are able to provide patients.
It limits the ability of hospitals and other health care providers
to require nurses to work mandatory overtime. The restrictions are
enforced through Medicare's provider agreements.
o S. 1304, Medicare coverage of oral phosphate-binding drugs for
kidney dialysis patients. Patients with end-stage renal disease
(ESRD) cannot eliminate dietary phosphorus and, without a kidney
transplant, often develop hyperphosphatemia. This condition - and
the hospitalization that accompanies it - can be prevented through
the use of phosphate-binding drugs, which reduce the absorption
of phosphorus in the body. Medicare coverage of phosphate binders
makes both medical and economical sense. Not only does the medication
improve the quality of life for patients with kidney failure, but
it stands to reduce overall Medicare costs associated with treating
hyperphosphatemia.
o S. 1303, The Kidney Patient Daily Dialysis Quality
Act of 2001. This bill will update the Medicare program's dialysis
coverage policy by eliminating the limitation on the number of sessions
now covered by Medicare. Specifically, this bill will move Medicare
beyond its conventional coverage of three dialysis sessions per
week to provide coverage of more frequent dialysis - as defined
by at least five times a week at a dialysis facility or in the home
- if determined appropriate by a patient's physician. More frequent
dialysis stands to save the Medicare program between $120 million
and $620 million per year.
o S. 841, The Medicare Mental Illness Non-Discrimination
Act. This bill will repeal the 50% copayment for outpatient mental
health services and replace it with the standard 20% copayment for
which all other outpatient services are assessed. Under the current
system, if a Medicare patient sees an endocrinologist for diabetes
treatment, an oncologist for cancer treatment, a cardiologist for
heart disease treatment or an internist for treatment of the flu,
the co-payment is 20% of the cost of the visit. If, however, a Medicare
patient visits a psychiatrist for treatment of mental illness, the
co-payment is 50% of the cost of the visit. This disparity in outpatient
co-payments represents discrimination against Medicare beneficiaries
with mental illness.
|